Allegations from a whistleblower have surfaced that ABC News gave Kamala Harris “sample questions” before last Tuesday’s debate with Donald Trump, which turned out to be the actual questions.

As we mentioned the morning after the debate, it was obvious that Kamala knew all the questions in advance and had memorized her responses to them.

In one instance, she even delivered her snappy punchline before the ABC News anchor finished asking her a question!

ABC News denies the allegation, but there is absolutely no reason to believe them.

Kamala Harris’s best friend—Disney executive Dana Walden, who introduced Kamala to her nanny-impregnating husband Doug Emhoff—is the boss of the ABC News anchors. That conflict of interest alone should have been enough to preclude ABC News from hosting a presidential debate at all. But whatever. Journalistic ethics are no longer practiced in America.

Co-anchor Lindsey Davis, aka Lindsey Lip Gloss, is a sorority sister of Kamala Harris. This would be another major conflict of interest if we had any honest media figures in this country. And don’t even get me started on David Muir.

Okay, since we’re on the subject, about David Muir…

I had already been at ABC News for six years when the network hired David. He rose to prominence by tracking the movements of the 9/11 hijackers in a series of reports for a New York affiliate. Everyone knew the instant that Muir walked into the building that he was an Operation Mockingbird/CIA spook.

Do you remember the Podesta files that WikiLeaks released during the 2016 election season? Those email files, which were probably passed to WikiLeaks on a thumb drive from the late Seth Rich, revealed a lengthy list of mainstream media reporters who were coordinating with the Hillary Clinton campaign through the Podesta Group.

Dozens of reporters from almost every mainstream media outlet (with Fox News being the only exception in 2016) were outed as being operatives for the Hillary Clinton campaign. The reporters were basically all unpaid campaign operatives for Crooked Hillary. They allowed the campaign to rewrite their stories and carried out all sorts of other pro-Hillary activities in their reporting.

It’s why the press coverage for the completely unlikeable Hillary was always showering her with praise while insulting and mocking the charming and warm Donald Trump.

Guess whose name was at the very TOP of the list of mainstream media reporters who were working for the Clinton campaign?

That would be David Muir. There’s no question about this. You can type in “David Muir” in the search box at WikiLeaks.org to this day for the year 2016 and his name pops up on 1,052 documents in the Podesta files.

So, the three suspects on our list include a Kamala Harris sorority sister, Kamala Harris’s best friend, and a nakedly leftwing partisan CIA spook known for collaborating with the Hillary Clinton campaign.

What do you think? Is there just a teeny-tiny possibility that Kamala had the questions ahead of time?

The unidentified whistleblower claims that Kamala was given sample questions that matched the real debate questions. The whistleblower also says that Kamala was assured that David Muir and Lindsey Lip Gloss were not going to fact-check her for anything she said.

They promised, according to the whistleblower, to only interrupt Donald Trump with fact checks to try to keep him off guard. Kamala would be safe and protected from anything that might throw her off while delivering her pre-rehearsed lines.

ABC News’s official response to the allegation is that they absolutely did not give Kamala the debate questions in advance. But that’s not what they’re accused of.

The alleged whistleblower is not saying they gave her “the” debate questions ahead of time. They’re saying that they sent her sample questions that turned out to be remarkably similar to the debate questions—and were even in the same order that the questions were asked on Tuesday night.

As for President Trump, he’s said he’s done and there will be no more dishonest debates. He already wrecked Joe Biden’s career in the first debate and then had to prepare to debate a completely different candidate when the Democrats replaced him. Why should he destroy Kamala in another debate while he’s comfortably ahead? If he crushed her in the next debate, they’d just replace her and then who knows who he would end up having to debate and run against?