
A 22-year-old walked across a college campus with a rifle hidden in his pant leg, climbed to a rooftop, and killed Charlie Kirk with a single shot. Utah Valley University had six campus police officers on duty for the 3,000 people who showed up. And now, when journalists ask what went wrong, UVU is handing over documents that are more black ink than text.
Six cops. Three thousand people. One rifle. Zero accountability.
The Daily Caller News Foundation filed a records request for UVU Police Chief Jeff Long’s personal communications related to Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025. What they got back was 50 documents — heavily redacted, with entire additional records withheld completely. The university cited state law protecting law enforcement investigations, attorney-client privilege, security concerns, educational privacy, and the catch-all favorite of every institution hiding something: information that could “jeopardize the life or safety of an individual.”
Nine of the redactions were based on a state law that protects law enforcement investigations and a person’s right to a fair trial. Two more hid behind attorney-client privilege. And beyond the redacted pages, UVU simply withheld additional matching records without disclosing them at all.
Here’s what we do know, because no amount of black ink can hide it: Tyler Robinson, the shooter, walked across campus with a rifle in his pant leg. He climbed the stairs to UVU’s Losee Center. He fired one shot from the rooftop. Charlie Kirk died. Robinson fled and surrendered 33 hours later after his parents intervened.
UVU had planned for 600 attendees. Three thousand showed up. There were no metal detectors. No ticketed entry system. Six campus police officers for an event featuring one of the most polarizing figures in conservative politics at a time when political violence was already a national conversation.
And the police chief had been warned.
Brian Harpole, head of Kirk’s private security detail, says he texted Chief Long before the event about a specific concern: students might be able to access the roof of UVU’s Sorensen Center, which sits across the street from the rooftop the shooter actually fired from. According to Harpole, Long responded: “I got you covered.”
He did not, in fact, have it covered.
Long later acknowledged as much at a press conference the day of the shooting: “We train for these things… unfortunately, today, we didn’t. And because of that, we had this tragic incident.”
So the chief admitted they didn’t execute their training. His private security counterpart says he raised the specific vulnerability that was exploited. The university planned for a fifth of the crowd that actually appeared. And now, six months later, the documents that would tell the public exactly what happened inside UVU’s security apparatus are blacked out.
The fragments that survived the redaction pen don’t reveal much. One visible email shows someone approving sound amplification: “I don’t see a problem with this.” Another, from September 9 — the day before the assassination — references someone wanting “to get a message to Charlie Kirk.” The rest is ink.
This isn’t the first time UVU has stonewalled. FOX 13 previously requested the security plan for Kirk’s event. UVU refused. Robinson’s legal team then successfully urged the court to keep records concealed. The pattern is consistent: every entity with the power to reveal what happened is using that power to make sure nobody finds out.
Utah Republican State Rep. Ryan Wilcox called the situation “a complete disaster.” That’s generous. A complete disaster implies things went wrong despite good intentions. What the redactions suggest is something worse — that the people responsible for security failures don’t want anyone examining how those failures happened.
Six officers for 3,000 attendees isn’t a staffing shortage. It’s a decision. And decisions have authors. Somewhere under all that black ink, there’s a name attached to the decision that left Charlie Kirk exposed on a campus where a man with a rifle in his pants walked unchallenged to a rooftop.
UVU doesn’t want us to read that name. Which tells us everything about who it belongs to.





